Inversed probability case-control analysis of operative burr hole evacuation versus subdural evacuating port system for chronic subdural hematomas: Clinical and economic outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: There are multiple treatments for a chronic subdural hematoma, a significant cause of neurosurgical morbidity that cost the healthcare system $5B in 2007, but few generalizable prospective studies. The purpose of this study was to examine outcomes of bedside Subdural Evacuation Port System (SEPS) placement as compared to operating room burr hole evacuation (BHE) to acquire data to support a randomized trial. METHODS: All procedures were performed in a single institution between 2011 and 2019. Patients were included if > 18 years of age, had chronic subdural hematoma, and were treated by SEPS or BHE. Patients with prior neurosurgical history, mass lesions or bilateral hematomas were excluded. Patients who met inclusion for SEPS (n = 55) or BHE (n = 105). Samples were propensity matched to account for variability. Non-inferiority tests compared outcomes. Cost data was obtained through billable charges. RESULTS: Patients with multiple comorbidities were more likely to undergo SEPS drainage. Noninferiority tests reported no statistically significant evidence to suggest SEPS drains were worse in reoperation-rate (18% vs 9%), post-operative seizure, or functional outcome. SEPS drain placement trended towards a faster time to procedure (3 h faster; p = 0.07) but the overall hospital stay was longer (4.23 vs 5.81, p = 0.01). SEPS drain placement costs are less than BHE, but these patients had 25% higher overall hospital costs (p = 0.01) due to comorbidities and increased hospital stay.

Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is a pressing public health issue. Although most cases do not result in severe illness requiring hospitalization, there is increasing evidence that SARS-CoV-2-induced inflammation can exacerbate pre-existing diseases. We sought to describe the characteristics of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who were actively or very recently infected with SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We reviewed subarachnoid hemorrhage cases of patients who also were positive for SARS-CoV-2 at 5 high-volume cerebrovascular centers in the United States from March 2020 to January 2021. Cases of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were identified, consisting of 5 women (50%) and 5 men (50%). Median age was 38.5 years. Four of the 10 patients (40%) were asymptomatic with respect to SARS-CoV-2-related symptoms, 3 patients (30%) had mild-to-moderate symptoms, and 3 patients (30%) had severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), with pneumonia and sepsis. Of the 10 cases, 4 had dissecting pseudoaneurysms (40%), 3 in the posterior circulation and 1 in the anterior circulation. Among 6 saccular/blister aneurysms, 4 (67%) were ≤4 mm in largest diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients positive for COVID-19 reveals a possibly distinct pattern compared with traditional aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, namely a high frequency of small aneurysms, dissecting pseudoaneurysms, and young patients.